Monday 29 April 2013

'Every step of the way to heaven is heaven'


So goes the wisdom of our 14th century saint, Catherine of Siena, another haloed wonder, whose feast we celebrate on April 29th. Her day coincides annually with the Green Day holiday in Japan (now a commemoration of one of the former Emperor's birthdays) and we enjoyed a grand potluck picnic feast out under the (now) fully leaved sakura trees in a forest at the local garden. These days in my town it is easy to relate to Catherine's heavenly passage through life and to be fully present to the vitality coming in.

What Catherine didn't say was that every step along the way felt like heaven. Just that it was: whether or not you knew or felt it.

Seeking an image for this post, I came across the beautiful icon by the New York-based artist Eileen McGuckin. I love the vibrant blues she has used in the background and the deep indigo of the cloak. 'God,' said Catherine, 'is closer to us than water to a fish.' The light shines beautifully through and calls to me in a way that I can sense so much better!

My interest in halos is, in part, due to the mystery-filled wonder windows that icons are. I am greatly attracted by them even while a lot of the time I don't really 'get' them in the way I think I could. My 'access' for the time being feels limited. That said, for now, there's something I quite like about feeling a bit disoriented by them. My interest in Catherine, other than the fact we share the name, is Dominican (for women of this tradition schooled me, consoled and grew me.) This, I was informed, was my name feast. But imagine my teenage disappointment laying eyes on this Andrea di Valli rendering of a  pale, rather sad looking and terrifically sombre soul. Consequently, I never formed much of a rapport with this particular saint, in part due that image and also because of a perhaps typically grotesque and dodgy fourteenth century hagiography that is hard to swallow. (I feel more connected with my fellow African, the much older Catherine of Alexandria--but more on that another time.)

From Ben Myers' chapter on Saints in Christ the Stranger: The Theology of Rowan Williams a reminder, or a challenge to stay open (and keep chewing!):
Much of what we call 'God' is fantasy, a self-protective projection of our own wishes and anxieties. But the anguish with which these 'holy neurotics' stand before God, the traumatic reshaping of their identities, the appalling purgation of their loves and desires --all this shows that their God could not possibly be just another instance of Freudian wish fulfilment. 'If they take God that seriously, at least this isn't some cosy made-up way of making yourself feel better.'
I'm leaving room for the possibility that we namesakes may become friends one day/ (I do like that icon. Thank you, Icon Drawer!) Catherine is a saint for nurses and the sick, for those with eating disorders and who have suffered miscarriages, for firefighters and female theologians (strong Dominican connection between love and knowledge).

For anyone interested there are a number of resources housed at the site called 'Drawn by Love' which is devoted to Catherine's life and mysticism.

Tuesday 23 April 2013

This lady's FOR turning

Further to the topic of turning I happened recently upon a most enjoyable and enlightening interview on CBC with the theologian, Richard Kearney [available here and about an hour long. He's Irish, widely read and a pleasure to listen to.] The topic of the talk is anatheism, a word I'd never come across. The prefix 'ana', from the Greek, means something along the lines of to go up/back/again; it encompasses the actions of re-turn and re-peat and re-member. The book on which the talk is based can be previewed here and you will see that the subtitle is 'Returning to God after God'. Kearney holds that atheism is part of religion, the part that embraces the absence of God. I find I can go along with him because I appreciate that he addresses the question of the ways trauma influences the life of faith. At some time in life, for many of us, God may (and perhaps should!) become a stranger, we may encounter a dark night of the soul, or possibly even come to an experience of the extreme in the so called 'death of God.' What, where and how are we to be once our lives have been ruptured?

Kearney communicates the dynamic of the Absence and Presence of God using the metaphor of dance . . .  and my imagination filled with images of the passion of flamenco, that wild, strict, strong, sad and fierce form, rather than anything conventional, pretty and 'nice'. [Listened to an interview with this photographer the other day, Lena Herzog, and you can take a look at her flamenco pix here]

I also thought of the beautiful Sufi form of prayer, the zikr. I did not know that the word meant remembrance in Persian: beautiful. Turning, revolving, is a fundamental condition of our existence.


There is no being which does not revolve and spiral and whirl -- from the dance of our deepest atoms, to the circulation of our blood, from our soft spinning on the planet to the far flung spiral galaxies' splashing out in space.

From Daniel Ladinsky's translation of Hafiz's poetry called The Gift, these few verses from the poem, ZIKR:

Remembrance lowers the cup into
His luminous sky-well.

The mind often becomes plagued and can deny
The all-pervading beauty
Of God

When the great work of zikr
Is forgotten.

I have chained my every dancing atom
Into a divine seat in the Beloved's Tavern.

*


Practices for The Faithful Incarnate: Part 2

Nobody's halo shines all the time. Well, maybe not nobody's, but it is a rare and precious person's that does, at least this side of heaven. Reaching effortlessness (or 'practicing death' as it is rather ominously put in the last post) takes a LOT of effort, because, yes, it is hard to get out of one's own way and to be where one is. The work is never done, it seems.

The next practice suggested by the scene in the garden in which Mary Magdalene meets Jesus is, as Coakley writes, the ability to 'turn and turn again, as Mary did twice before she saw that it was Jesus right in front of her'. At first she did not recognize Jesus at all; nor was she the only one who failed to see him. There were others too who just could not quite wrap their minds around the possibility that the promises had come true. Things don't get much odder. But, wait: there's more --
    "This is another very strange thought: that the risen Christ, being God's Son, is here all the time but that we have to 'turn' and keep 'turning' toward his gaze, until our sense and mind and soul and heart are so attuned and magnetized to his presence that we too can say Rabbouni! - not to grasp and hold him, not to constrain him within our restricted human categories, but to worship and adore him."
I had an experience last week after a particularly long day when I took myself off for a stroll in the nearby garden. I know that there's not much that a walk can't loosen or cure. Also, there is something magical about the time of long shadows in my town. My feet found their way over to the poets' pavilion, a simple wooden shelter built in the traditional style, which is bisected into two facing floors separated by a flowing stream in which sit a few beautifully expressive rocks. There was a time when poets gathered in the heart of the garden, with cups of floating sake for inspiration and lubrication, where the creation and recitation of poetry was enjoyed.



 It was late afternoon and not many others were in the garden. I removed my shoes and sat on the wooden floor feeling weary and a bit blue. After a short while, I suddenly became aware of the sound of trickling water, of birdsong, warmth, light, the green and red colours of new leaves. What was amazing to me was that nothing around me had changed. The scene was just so, but sitting quietly I was suddenly able to make sense of what was around me. Where had I been before that? Wrapped up in my own concerns, I suppose, not unlike Mary that momentous and emotional morning. Nothing had changed around me except my ability to tune in to the present. Opening to it brought on the sweet surprise of something rising in my spirit as if a crust had cracked; it felt like making way/space, like coming home, like a quenching of thirst. What had happened? How was it that I was able to breathe again? That I felt re-membered, all the fragments gathered and at once, calm. Could it really have been the simple recognition of being present in the moment?

I often wonder 'What keeps us apart from this current in the daily round?' and I wonder in the wake of my 'coming around' whether this resembles the Magdalene's dawning perception, the perception that was only possible once she had made the turn, allowed herself to momentarily be distracted from her full feeling and entranced by the reality before her?
    "… To turn is to keep longing for and loving him, even in despair . . . to keep discerning the wind of Christ's Spirit and leaning into it, until love and knowledge and     sensuality all align and we can know as we are known in him."




Sunday 14 April 2013

Practises for The Faithful Incarnate: Part 1

Sarah Coakley wrote a ravishing set of meditations for Easter entitled "Meaning beyond meaning" available here. Oh, do read them - and slowly - if you have a chance. I have found the ones I have read and spent time with rich and rewarding. The last section is the Noli me tangere incident and it has provided sure guidance and deepened my own reflections on the question I left off with in the last post.

I had an inkling that the key was going to be Practice. Coakley encourages us to believe in 3 possible, (and yes, granted,) extraordinarily demanding things; and not only to believe them, but to practise them, with soul and mind and body, on and on up to your life's end, until you come to "see the Lord" face to face. Practice of what, specifically? Three specific things based on the first encounter with the resurrected Jesus. They are
  • the practice of death and
  • the practice of turning, and finally
  • allowing for these prior practices to open the heart and the mind to enable a vision of Christ 
In the next few posts I'll share how these make sense for the time being for me. As to the third point, that is a constantly unfolding mystery and one that I do not think I can approach any way but 'slant'.

*
To 'practice death' might seem a strange idea but it is not without Biblical foundation. Paul in his epistle to the Romans writes that we are 'to die with Christ' and be 'baptized into his death'. As Coakley notes, Paul's call is uncomfortably at odds with the individualizing drive in modern (particularly western) societies. For me, however, there is something recognizable in the call, something familiar that I have witnessed and learned from living in this far eastern milieu. Here, where people take belonging to the land, the culture, the family and the group with the utmost seriousness, the self is not at the centre in the same way as it is in western (and invariably more multi-cultural) societies. As the stereotype goes, the Japanese are a group-oriented people. I catch glimpses every now and then and think that this might well resemble what the early church looked like for is not this strong sense of dependence and interdependence within the group surely at the root of the word 'religion' (Old French: 'obligation, bond, reverence; Latin: to bind)?

There are these informing virtues, too, that (ideally? in my opinion and experience?) flavour Japanese morality and which have had great and lasting impact particularly on the traditional arts. I remember being shocked in my early days here talking with a lady who was going to 'a tea lesson'. I asked her how long she had been taking lessons and she told me she'd been a student for more than 25 years. I confess my younger self did wonder whether she was an inordinately slow learner, or, giving her the benefit of the doubt, if 'making tea' was especially hard to learn.

Mastery, I have since learned, is intimately connected to the practice of death. I took up calligraphy, Japanese brush writing, and learned something of the lesson there. You practice and practice and practice, and then practice some more, and then some, until, like the line from Yeats--"How can we know the dancer from the dance?"--you are at one with what is true. Coakley notes that it is only by 'handing ourselves over', into a seeming loss of selfhood, absorbing ourselves in the practice (prayer, sacraments and service) that we will 'find our true selves - the living Christ-like selves that God longs us to be.' But note well, you do not know how that is going to look or how it is going to feel. Therein lies the rub.

A draft sketch on unstretched paper and below, a photo, of the mounted verse
Once upon a time I found a poem, or part of a poem, by the Zen Buddhist master, Dogen. It read: 'Forget the self. Become one with ten thousand things.' (I do love those ten thousand things!) I decided it would be a nice reminder and went about thinking about the ideograms I could use that would come close enough to what I heard Dogen's words trying to say. With my teacher's advice I settled on 'mu ga mu shin'. Muga means selflessness, self-effacement, self-renunciation, 'no self' -- the Buddhist concept that in nothing does there exist an inherent self, soul, ego. All of which may be easier to digest in the words of John Muir, he of the Californian woods, who said, 'When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe.' Mu shin means a kind of freedom or innocence, something like the kind of heaven Jesus recognizes as most fit for children (Matt. 18:3). In adultspeak, mushin means to be free from obstructive thoughts. I am not a Buddhist but I find I am surrounded by the ethos and it is gentle and it has gentled me.

But this verse made me wretched. The painting became a painful reminder of the chasm between my vision and ambition and what came out of my brushes. My teacher saw no such thing; she liked what I had painted so much she deemed it worthy of framing on a scroll. Why, oh why did I ever agree? And having had it mounted on a silk scroll, I then had to sit with it in an exhibition for days on end. Oh, the woe of it, the burning shame of it. I couldn't stand to look at it. But what I learned was what Dogen had to teach, I suppose, though for a time those ten thousand things bugged the hell out of me and I confess to having been filled with 'obstructive thoughts'!

Coakley writes
But when, in all the difficulties and agonies that authentic prayer brings, we realize that persevering in it means "handing over" the reins of control to God and just letting Christ's Spirit pray within us, then we begin to see that our false, conscious, striving self has to go. And as that self is worn away in a process that feels like death, something unimaginably mysterious starts to emerge - the new life of selfhood that is Christ's own and which transcends all individualism. To be a Christian is to "practise death" in this way, until we are no longer afraid of death; and when we are no longer afraid of death, we are no longer afraid of life - the ecstatic, abundant Life that Jesus holds out to us.
 *

"Be brave, cherry blossoms
 and fall!"

the little trout
~Issa


                                                           心して桜ちれちれ鮎小鮎

                                                kokoro shite sakura chire-chire ayu ko ayu

Saturday 13 April 2013

If you've ever wondered . . .

What ten thousand halos looked like, this picture will give you some idea . . .


A communion of saints, a riot of cherry blossoms . . .

Monday 8 April 2013

How to be a faithful incarnate?

On the first Sunday after Easter the Church remembers the story of Thomas. I love the mind-bending materializations Jesus effects after the event of the cross: how better to express triumph? I am truly tickled by his impossible-made-possible appearances. I love the lightning energy involved in the (delayed) recognitions and am full of wonder at the moments between the perception and rupture understanding brings. Can you imagine the shattering of the minds which accompany the revelation--that which has been dreamed of and hoped for, that which is totally new--breaking in. Breathtaking!

There are two stories that stand out for me from the events following the resurrection which I have been thinking about over the past week, each concerning touch and the struggle to apprehend a reality utterly new and yet materially embodied and present. The first is Mary Magdalene's mistaking the Master for the gardener on Easter morning. The story shows the truth dawning on Mary once she hears her name spoken by Jesus. She cries out the name of her beloved teacher with love and shock and then there follows the perplexing Noli me tangere scene in which Jesus wards off Mary's touch dispatching her instead on a mission to inform the disciples of her encounter with the Risen One. (So much for the text but rifle though archives though I have, I have not (yet?) been able to find any art done by a woman of this scene and this leaves me feeling a little wobbly about well, predictable things regarding gender.) Could the 'do not cling to me' message at this powerfully vulnerable point in the narrative be a message about the necessity of letting go, of Jesus' 'launching' Mary, of allowing, if in a rather forceful manner, a new form of relationship to emerge? Could it be about Christ's trust in Mary's ability to integrate the reality of who and what this encounter meant? Did keeping his distance cost Jesus as much as it must have done Mary?

I found this image by Sustris from the sixteenth century which I particularly liked because of the labyrinth, the archetypal symbol for the journey that takes place inwardly and outwardly that, despite what appears as a set of tangling paths, always and only leads home.



On the Church clock a week later, invisibility cloak shed once more, Jesus unexpectedly appears to the twelve within the four walls of a locked room. We learn that Thomas the Twin had missed out on some of the previous showings and had declared in an endearingly blockheaded way, with a swaggering bravado so instantly recognizable in the human family that, "Unless I see in his hands the mark of the nails, and place my finger into the mark of the nails and place my hand into his side, I will never believe." (John 20.25)  The story is most memorably expressed in Caravaggio's arresting painting, The Incredulity of Thomas, (below) which has kept me company for some days now. (In the meantime, I have learned that this event is called in the Orthodox tradition, The Assurance of Thomas. A smile-worthy shift in the usual perspective regarding doubt, I find.) Who does not totally identify with Thomas' demands? The Church fathers found his doubt not at all unreasonable and we are given Jesus responding to him in effect saying, 'Here, let me show you'. I read Jesus as telling Thomas to get over himself and, commending those who 'have not seen and yet have believed', is surely subtly reminding him of all the things that Thomas had witnessed and experienced while Jesus was journeying fully in the same dimension as the apostles. To his credit, Thomas does truly see and know, his inner walls collapse, he remembers himself, says the Name and freely abandons all previous resistance.


The ascension - has it taken place, or not? Mary cannot touch him because Jesus says the ascension, though imminent, has not happened. Thomas, by contrast, is guided to the wounds (has the ascension happened? Is that still the point, or have things moved on in the sense that there is a different teaching for a different person and/or need?) 

Are these stories about
    •    ways of knowing and believing - specifically, the involvement of the senses in knowing. Does perceiving Jesus' presence demand a heightening of the senses, as Suzanne Guthrie has suggested?
    •    the ability which some personalities have to be with uncertainty while others cannot stand too much;
    •    the foundations grounding relationship? In Mary's recognition of the Master her ripeness for mission is affirmed whereas Thomas' stubborn ultimatum points to an 'iffiness' that God reaches out for.

These stories are connected in my mind as I reflect on the current status of higher education in the Humanities, which finds itself in a skeptical and scientistic mood (called 'practical' by its supporters) by which I mean there are demands for 'concrete proof' (yaargh!) that what is real is real, worth-while (yes, indeed, in terms of 'silver pieces') and, and er, if it's not too much to ask, certain to bear predictable results. Like a building or a parking lot.

Or a gash to the body.

Looking at Caravaggio's painting and thinking about Mary's belated recognition, I wonder about prohibitions, invitations, commands, the relationship one cultivates with one's self, letting go, ultimata, matters of belief, knowing, the role of sense perception, the various strengths of women and men, art, the centrality of the body and our participation in relationship and the question: How to be a faithful incarnate?



Sunday 7 April 2013

Happy Easter, friends


Season's greetings at least within the octave of the feast! This year Eastertide has coincided exactly with the advent of the full blossoming of the sakura (cherry blossoms) and all the Bacchanalia that accompanies it. Not much time for reflection in the midst of the hanami night and day and all the chaos of another term beginning at the university. There are so many connections to make though in the realm of the blessed and I hope to be able to post something more substantial soonish. But for now, a haiku from the poet Issa that suggests the two things the sakura signify most powerfully: beauty and transience.

ただ頼々とや桜咲

tada tanome tada tanome to ya sakura saku

simply trust,
 simply trust!

cherry blossoms in bloom